By Augustin T., Wolff J.

Retrospectively amassed period information are frequently stated incorrectly. an immense kind of such an blunders is heaping - respondents are likely to round-off or round-up the information in keeping with a few rule of thumb. for 2 designated instances of the Weibull version we research the behaviour of the 'naive estimators', which easily forget about the dimension mistakes because of heaping, and derive closed expressions for the asymptotic bias. those effects supply a proper justification of empirical proof and simulation-based findings pronounced within the literature. also, occasions the place a awesome bias should be anticipated could be pointed out, and a precise bias correction will be played.

Show description

Read or Download A bias analysis of Weibull models under heaped data PDF

Similar organization and data processing books

New PDF release: The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis

While you're into records an excellent ebook but when you take it since you need to no longer this type of strong learn.

Read e-book online Computing and Information Technologies PDF

Offers a balanced presentation of the newest options, algorithms and functions in laptop technology and engineering. The papers written, supply a automobile for brand spanking new examine and improvement.

Additional info for A bias analysis of Weibull models under heaped data

Sample text

P(x, mP ) (20) where P is the total number of pixels present in the cameras. The projection of our human hand model, viewed as an image, can be seen in Fig. 1(c). The relationship between the Skeleton, Corpulence and Projection models is shown in Fig. 1(d). t. x gives JP (x), a P × S matrix, where S is the number of state parameters allowed to change through tracking. The (p, s) component of JP is ∂P(x, mp ) . ∂xs (21) ∂Pεb (x, mp ) ∂P(x, mp ) = ∂xs ∂xs (22) [JP (x)]p,s = Using (19), 30 P. Kaimakis and J.

The full Projection model, which forms the basis of our comparison with the visual cue extracted from the data, is therefore given by P(x, m) = min {P b (x, m)} b Eb b =1 B (19) b=1 where the min operator chooses between several conic fields b , of different bones b, if more than one are non-zero at any pixel m. Finally, P(x) is a consideration of all pixels m present in the cameras, making it a P -sized vector: T P(x) = P(x, m1 ) . . P(x, mp ) . . P(x, mP ) (20) where P is the total number of pixels present in the cameras.

The (p, s) component of JP is ∂P(x, mp ) . ∂xs (21) ∂Pεb (x, mp ) ∂P(x, mp ) = ∂xs ∂xs (22) [JP (x)]p,s = Using (19), 30 P. Kaimakis and J. Lasenby S(x0 ), C(x0 ) P(x0 ) camera’s image plane (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 1. Skeleton, Corpulence and Projection models for the human hand. For all these models the state for the hand’s rest-position x0 was used. (a) Skeleton model S(x0 ). t. the 3D origin. Lighting conditions have been used for illustration of the three-dimensionality of S(x0 ). (b) Corpulence model C(x0 ).

Download PDF sample

A bias analysis of Weibull models under heaped data by Augustin T., Wolff J.


by Anthony
4.2

Download e-book for kindle: A bias analysis of Weibull models under heaped data by Augustin T., Wolff J.
Rated 4.45 of 5 – based on 44 votes